<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free full-featured Medical Image viewer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.herofish.com/2009/01/free-full-featured-medical-image-viewer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.herofish.com/2009/01/free-full-featured-medical-image-viewer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.herofish.com/2009/01/free-full-featured-medical-image-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herofish.com/2009/01/free-full-featured-medical-image-viewer/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Jim, thanks for that update, I couldn&#039;t get MicroDICOM to install and run without crashing, though I must admit I didn&#039;t spend a lot of time trying to make it work.  There seemed to be so many DICOM viewers to try out, it just didn&#039;t make a lot of sense to spend the time on one that was causing me trouble.  Very likely its something specific to me or my computer.  What is your experience with the tool?  Is it stable for you?  Also, I know DICOMWorks is very widely used as a free alternative to specific vendors viewers, however I didn&#039;t see the option to open a DICOMDIR there, do you know if it has this ability?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, thanks for that update, I couldn&#8217;t get MicroDICOM to install and run without crashing, though I must admit I didn&#8217;t spend a lot of time trying to make it work.  There seemed to be so many DICOM viewers to try out, it just didn&#8217;t make a lot of sense to spend the time on one that was causing me trouble.  Very likely its something specific to me or my computer.  What is your experience with the tool?  Is it stable for you?  Also, I know DICOMWorks is very widely used as a free alternative to specific vendors viewers, however I didn&#8217;t see the option to open a DICOMDIR there, do you know if it has this ability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.herofish.com/2009/01/free-full-featured-medical-image-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herofish.com/2009/01/free-full-featured-medical-image-viewer/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I work in medical image field and I use MicroDicom and DicomWokrs. MicroDicom can open DICOMDIR files witout problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in medical image field and I use MicroDicom and DicomWokrs. MicroDicom can open DICOMDIR files witout problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

